Helping Christians to make a difference
Dealing with current Issues
Helping Christian families to make a difference
It’s less than a week since Kevin Rudd took the leadership of the federal Labor Party and became Prime Minister of Australia for the second time.
This Report covers the changes, the new Cabinet, the record of failed policies, media and other reports on Kevin Rudd's leadership.
The final section is a comprehensive overview of the taking of the Oath of Office by the Prime Minister. Several questions have been raised - we address those below...
In the wake of the leadership change, a number of Cabinet Ministers resigned. At least five Ministers and a number of other Labor MPs have said they will not contest the coming election and will retire from politics. The latest of these is Simon Crean, a former Minister who was already on the back bench.
After all the talk of gender politics, some of Julia Gillard’s staunchest female supporters, such as Senator Penny Wong, deserted her in the name of ‘pragmatism’ (read report).
Kevin Rudd’s new Cabinet has now been announced and was sworn in early this week.
For a full list of Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Secretaries – and a list of those who have gone, see this article… Kevin Rudd's new-look ministry, ABC, 1/7/2013.
This is the first time that a Muslim has become a Member of the frontbench. Ed Husic, the Member for Chifley in Western Sydney, was sworn in using a Quran. (More in our next News Update.)
Kevin Rudd’s record of failed policies
Many commentators in the media are reminding the Australian people about what happened the last time Kevin Rudd was the Prime Minister – the failed policies and the increasing debt. Policies like the asylum seeker/boat smuggling, the carbon pricing, the mining tax – and going from a surplus to a huge deficit.
And some have reminded us that, in essence, Kevin Rudd’s policies are Julia Gillard’s polices and are (now) Kevin Rudd’s policies! See more on policies below.
Kevin Rudd as PM – how has it come to this?
During the last leadership challenge by Kevin Rudd, many Labor Ministers were highly critical of Mr Rudd and spoke about how Mr Rudd was unable to govern – a number of them have now resigned from Cabinet. The Liberal party is already running ads highlighting these statements.
Other Labor heavyweights are critical of the undermining that Kevin Rudd has engaged in – including Graham Richardson, Michael Costa (a former NSW Labor MP and Treasurer - on the Bolt Report last Sunday) who said Kevin Rudd is a ‘policy dilettante’, and former leader Mark Latham. Some refer to the ‘pragmatism’ of some Labor MPs returning to Kevin Rudd because they think they might save some seats although acknowledging that many of them can’t stand him – or as Michael Costa said, they ‘hate him’. Mr Costa noted this is about ‘personality, not policy’.
Mark Latham wrote, “The return of Kevin Rudd is the final hammer blow in the destruction of Labor’s moral code. The person who sabotaged its 2010 campaign is now its leader for the 2013 election. The message for young activists on the so-called progressive side of politics is clear: the way ahead is through dishonesty, treachery and cowardice. If they sabotage an organisation, ultimately, they will be rewarded with its leadership. They too, like Mr Rudd, can be the ruler of the ruins. . .”
Article: Rudd’s redux raised on ruins, AFR, 29/6/2013.
The stalking of Julia Gillard
This week a new book about the stalking of Julia Gillard by Kevin Rudd since she took over as Prime Minster. It has been written by former Canberra journalist Kerry-Anne Walsh.
Kerry-Anne, a left-leaning journalist who is extremely sympathetic to Julia Gillard, has also written an article outlining how Kevin Rudd conducted a campaign to regain the Prime Ministership. She writes, “A year after her ascent, the undercurrent had become so poisonous that Gillard was forced into fighting a ludicrous battle against a man who had been removed from office because he was incapable of governing, who was despised by the overwhelming majority of his caucus colleagues and, most importantly, whose return many feared would plummet the government into the same chaotic state that had prompted his removal….”
Article: In his sights: Covert Kevin's mission to get Julia, SMH, 30/6/2013.
Paul Sheehan writes in the SMH about the deposing of Julia Gillard and contends that Kevin Rudd wants to assert his power before the election, and suggests that the election is more likely to be later (possibly October) than earlier.
He also outlines the attempt by Kevin Rudd to portray himself as being ‘positive’.
His conclusion: “Having exacted his revenge, the restored Rudd is now busy peddling the myth that he represents a positive break from negative politics. The electorate already has enough contrasts to make a choice. The Coalition vows to stop the people smugglers, repeal the carbon tax, oppose gay marriage and curb union excesses. All that is needed is the election. Don't hold your breath.”
Article: Myth man is back on his throne, Paul Sheehan, SMH, 30/6/2013.
Back in 2010, Paul Sheehan wrote an insightful article about the failed policies of the Kevin-Rudd-as-PM era. It is essential reading if you have forgotten about the policies of the Rudd Labor government.
He began, “Rarely has a government promised so much, spent so much, said so much, and launched so many nationwide programs, and delivered so little value for money and expectation. Two years of Kevin Rudd has produced 20 years of debt, and most of it cannot be blamed on the global financial crisis. This alphabet soup is self-inflicted.”
The article has one item for each letter of the alphabet – from A for asylum seekers, B for Beijing, C for Computers in schools, D for debt and deficit….
Article: How Rudd the dud dropped Australia in the alphabet soup, Paul Sheehan, February 22, 2010, The Age, SMH.
Miranda Devine writes that Kevin Rudd’s “popularity was inversely proportional to how well you knew him. The clue to Kevin Rudd, I found, is to think of him as the hologram in Red Dwarf, a wholly constructed personality. He is KRuddMP, his twitter avatar (1.2 million followers, cheesy grin, flashing V for victory from the back bench, mobile phone in hand.) Kevin Rudd the person is invisible. You can’t get a handle on him like you would a human. You must rely on a forensic profile of his actions, following a trail of policy blunders and fractured relationships to construct a picture of the real Rudd. The problem for Rudd is that, before he was ousted in 2010, that picture was starting to come into focus, and his poll approval began to plunge. KRuddMP’s inflated self-importance had not translated to any achievements …”
Article: Allergic to KRuddPM 2.0, Miranda Devine, Daily Telegraph, 29/6/2013.
Kevin Rudd – has his leadership style really changed?
In a revealing interview, aired on ABC radio back in February 2012, Professor John Mendoza said he had quit as Kevin Rudd’s senior advisor on mental health because Mr Rudd's leadership was ‘dysfunctional, erratic and chaotic’. He also said Mr Rudd had been removed as the leader for his "own wellbeing": “The Australian public is now starting to understand that he (Mr Rudd) wasn't knifed in the back, in fact he was removed for his own wellbeing and the Government of the country had to function".
Media report of interview: Rudd removed from top job for own wellbeing, West Australian, 25/2/2012.
John Button, a former Age journalist and Kevin Rudd’s former speech writer, spoke out last February about the problems with trying to work with Kevin Rudd…
Article: Lest they forget what Rudd was like…, Vex News, 25/2/2012.
At the same time, Vex News ran a more extensive article on the situation regarding Kevin Rudd’s flawed approach to government.
Policy differences – or more of the same?
In the next few weeks Kevin Rudd will be trying to make some distinctions between the policies of Labor under Julia Gillard and his own policies.
Of course, many of these are very similar. On boat people – on a carbon price (a tax or an emissions trading scheme now?) – on mining taxes – on education ‘reform’ already operating under a ‘new name’ – and so on.
Within days of taking over the leadership of the Labor Party, Kevin Rudd was in the midst of controversy over his claim that the Coalition policy of ‘turning back the boats’ would risk confrontation with Indonesia – and even armed conflict.
He referred to ‘Konfrontasi’, a very controversial conflict between Indonesia and Malaysia in the 1960s (read about it here).
This drew wide criticism from the media, but Kevin Rudd insisted he was right and repeated the claim.
Of course, the Coalition has only ever said they would do so ‘when safe’ and only in international waters. Plus, when this same policy was implemented under the Howard government, they actually worked closely with Indonesia, with AFP officers in Indonesia, to help them stop the people smuggling trade (read about that in this 2004 article).
Much of the media was extremely critical of his remarks – as well as the Coalition’s Julie Bishop and John Howard.
Greg Sheridan, foreign editor of The Australian, wrote,
“ON the eve of his first visit to Indonesia as a restored Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd has repeated his appallingly irresponsible remarks suggesting that Tony Abbott's boat turnaround policy could indirectly lead to military conflict between Australia and Indonesia.
Over the weekend, Rudd said he stood by all his previous remarks, which compared Abbott's policies with those which led to the Konfrontasi conflict in the early 1960s in which Australian and Indonesian soldiers engaged in deadly combat.
He also once more canvassed the possibility of direct naval confrontation on the high seas between Australia and Indonesia as a result of Abbott's policies.
In 35 years of writing about foreign policy, I have never seen such irresponsible comments by an Australian leader.
It is unprecedented, and unspeakably reckless and foolish, for an Australian leader to airily canvass the idea of military conflict with Australia's closest considerable neighbour.
The fact that Rudd has repeated these remarks demonstrates they were not a mistake at last Thursday's press conference, but are a deliberate and considered strategy…”
Article: PM's remarks are grimly irresponsible, Greg Sheridan, The Australian, 1/7/20133.
Taking the Oath of Office
In our report last week we noted that Kevin Rudd took an Oath of Office on the Bible and his other two Ministers (Albanese and Bowen) took an Affirmation.
Our main point was to distinguish who did what, as we are often asked this question!
A couple of points need to be made to clarify this situation…
Holding the Bible
It has been noted that Kevin Rudd did not actually hold the Bible whilst he read the Oath. Kevin Rudd had a Bible in his hand as he approached the table where the Governor-General was seated. He put the Bible on the table and took the Oath document with two hands and read it. The oath stated, “I, Kevin Michael Rudd, do swear that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia, her land and her people, in the office of Prime Minister, so help me God.”
Some commented that he was not actually touching the Bible when he read the Oath.
Click here to view the ceremony.
The second point relates to allegiance to the Queen
The National Archives note that, in 2007, Kevin Rudd was only the second Prime Minister to choose NOT to swear allegiance to the Queen (the first being Paul Keating).
At the start of every parliament, all MPs must attest to their allegiance to the Queen – this can be an Oath (on the Bible) or an Affirmation.
Section 42 of the Constitution says, "Every senator and every member of the House of Representatives shall before taking his seat make and subscribe before the Governor-General, or some person authorised by him, an oath or affirmation of allegiance in the form set forth in the schedule to this Constitution." Section 42
The full Constitution - click here.
The Schedule to the Constitution sets out the form of the Oath or Affirmation of allegiance to the Queen said by Senators and MPs. (Read Schedule)
There is no constitutional requirement for the Oath of Office for the PM or Ministers to include this statement of allegiance to the Queen. In fact, there is no mention of 'Prime Minister' in the Constitution.
However, mention of allegiance to the Queen has usually been included by the Prime Minister in their Oath ‘by tradition’.
John Howard reinstated the statement of allegiance to the Queen in his Oath of Office as PM, but it was removed by Mr Rudd.
Taking an Oath on the Bible
Over the years, we have had people comment on whether Christians should take an Oath on the Bible.
A very interesting and comprehensive overview of Oaths and Affirmations, and the form of these from Federation to the present, including the type taken by various Prime Ministers and Minsters, was recently published on the federal Parliament website.
One interesting point was made that some MPs have chosen not to take an Oath on the Bible for theological reasons, citing Matthew 5:36-37 where Jesus says, ‘But I tell you, do not swear an oath at all… All you need to say is simply ‘Yes’ or ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.’
These aspects are all covered in this APH document:
If you saw the ‘Wonders of Life’ Documentary on ABC TV last night, you might like to read this assessment of the evolutionary mindset of the program by CMI UK speaker Dominic Statham.
The four part BBC series is presented by Professor Brian Cox, who teaches physics, and is tipped to take over form David Attenborough.
Dominic has written two articles. The first deals with the first episode. The second covers the remaining episodes.
Wonders of Life—Part 1: How life first began, Dominic Statham, CMI, 2013.
Over the past week, our colleagues who assist people in dealing with unwanted same-sex attraction have been very disturbed by the closure of Exodus International, the North American umbrella group of ministries working in this area.
Last week the President of Exodus International, Alan Chambers, issued an apology to the homosexual community – for the pain and hurt he said had been caused by the organisation as they helped people deal with unwanted same-sex attraction. At the same time, he did acknowledge that he believed that God placed boundaries surrounding sex and that he didn't support the re-defining of marriage - which caused some activists to ask what he was actually apologising for... But overall, he was rejecting the work Exodus International had done for 37 years.
The ‘apology’ was released just before the annual conference of Exodus International was held. The ‘apology’ was followed by Alan Chambers making an announcement at the start of the conference that Exodus International was closing down as a ministry (after 37 years). He also said a new organisation, called ‘Reduce Fear’, would be launched.
The following day, Alan Chambers featured in a television program for ‘Our America’ on the Oprah Winfrey Network, titled ‘God & Gays’, where he apologised, and listened to survivors tell their stories of how they had been affected by ministries such as Exodus and had been unable to remove their same-sex attraction. This had obviously been in production for some time! [In March 2011, Alan Chambers appeared in an earlier episode for ‘Our America’ called ‘Pray the gay away?’]
Exodus is well-known worldwide for helping people who want to deal with unwanted same-sex attraction. Before we go further, it is VERY IMPORTANT to note that this apology and announcement ONLY apply to Exodus International, the North American body.
Exodus Global Alliance is the world-wide umbrella body of organisations that assist people deal with unwanted same-sex attraction. They do not support this announcement and remain committed to offering transformation through the gospel and helping people who wish to deal with unwanted same-sex.
Heading in this direction for some time...
Alan Chambers and Exodus International have been heading in this direction for some time. They had already distanced themselves from ‘reparative therapy’.
In January 2012, Alan Chambers spoke on a Panel at the ‘Gay Christian Network’ Conference about homosexuality and behaviour. Then, in June 2012, Alan Chambers made a major statement, about a ‘New Direction’. [Links for all of these below]
A number of groups who have been part of Exodus International in the USA expressed grave concerns about the direction that Exodus International was heading in and withdrew from the organisation when their concerns were not heard. They have now formed the Restored Hope Network.
Robert Gagnon, associate professor of New Testament at Pittsburgh Theological Seminary, has closely followed these concerning developments. Last year, when Alan Chambers published the ‘New Direction’ letter, Robert called on him, and the Chairman of the Board of Exodus International to resign. The Board Chairman is also the Pastor of the church attended by Alan Chambers.
At that time, Robert Gagnon wrote a 34 page response to Alan Chambers ‘New Direction’ letter. In his response, and again a month ago, he highlighted the problematic theological ideas embraced and taught by Alan Chambers and his pastor regarding the nature of salvation, grace and discipleship - with no requirement to follow Christ or confess sins after salvation and that one’s salvation is secure despite one’s behaviour. Robert is now an advisor to the Restored Hope Network. Link to article below.
Following the closure of Exodus International, Michael Brown writes, “While the secular media is celebrating the demise of Exodus International and gay activists are hoping this will be the nail in the coffin of ex-gay ministries, Jesus continues to save, transform and liberate homosexual men and women all around the world.”
Michael goes on to list 6 lessons we can learn from the collapse of Exodus International. Link to article below.
There is much that could be said about this development. However, we would ask that you read these two attached articles, which outline some of the major concerns and the theological issues surrounding this move.
Please pray for the ministries in the Restored Hope Network and for the ministries in Exodus Global Alliance as they continue to provide support and encouragement to men and women who desire to deal with unwanted same-sex attraction.
Recent recommended articles
Article by Michael Brown, 6 Lessons From the Collapse of Exodus International - Charisma Magazine, 24/6/2013.
Robert Gagnon’s article - Why Exodus, Chambers Are on a Collision Course With Jesus, Charisma Magazine, 21/5/2013.
God & Gays program:
Outline of the Our America program - click here.
Our America – Timeline of interviews and program with Alan Chambers
Alan Chambers 'New Direction' - June 2012
Article in The Atlantic - Sexual Healing: Evangelicals Update Their Message to Gays, Letter by Alan Chambers – New Direction’, 20/6/2012.
Actual Letter on ‘New Direction by Alan Chambers, June 2012: Defining Exodus – Letter from Alan Chambers for June 2012
Article about Robert Gagnon’s 34 page response to Alan Chambers ‘New Direction’ letter:
Robert Gagnon’s Critique of Alan Chambers and the New Direction of Exodus International, 30/6/2012.
Robert Gagnon’s 34 page response: Time for a Change of Leadership at Exodus?, June 2012.
Alan Chambers at the Gay Christian Network Meeting, Jan 2012:
Alan Chambers at the GCN Conference - Alan Chambers Signals a Shift at Exodus
Despite all the assurances from Kevin Rudd over the past few months that he would not challenge for the federal Labor Party leadership, it all came to a head yesterday - the second last day of Parliament sitting before the federal election.
Yesterday, Julia Gillard told the media that the normal procedure was for a challenger to tell the leader that they planned to challenge and that then a ballot would be held. She noted that this was not the situation, but in the current circumstances of constant speculation and undermining, she said she had called a ballot for the leadership of the Labor Party to be held at 7pm last night. She called for the loser to LEAVE politics, saying, "This is it. If you win, you're Labor leader; if you lose, you retire from politics.''
As you undoubtedly know by now, Kevin Rudd then announced he would contest the leadership – and he won by 57 votes to 45 at the Labor caucus meeting held last night.
In the wake of that ballot, Wayne Swan resigned as Deputy Leader, and Anthony Albanese was elected as the new Deputy Leader. Senator Stephen Conroy resigned as leader in the Senate and was replaced by Senator Penny Wong. Chris Bowen has been given the position of Treasurer.
In all, six Government Ministers resigned from Cabinet: Wayne Swan, Stephen Conroy, Greg Combet, Craig Emerson, Peter Garrett and Joe Ludwig.
Why did this happen?
In recent weeks, Labor's position in the polls (both opinion polls and internal Labor polling) had declined dramatically. As we have reported some commentators had predicted the loss of tens of seats. Labor polling apparently indicated that their losses would not be as BAD if they changed leaders to Kevin Rudd.
Undoubtedly, many Labor MPs and Senators were increasingly concerned about the predictions of losing a large number of seats held by Labor at the election.
What are Kevin Rudd's policies?
Several weeks ago, Kevin Rudd announced that he was now fully supporting the re-defining of 'marriage' to include same-sex couples.
Following this leadership change we now have a situation where three of the key people in the Labor Government are actively supporting and promoting same-sex 'marriage' - Kevin Rudd, Anthony Albanese and Penny Wong.
It is important to note that Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard essentially have the SAME policies. Many of these were established during the time of the previous Rudd government. They were both instrumental in advocating for a ‘carbon price’, for a mining tax and for overturning the Coalition’s policy on asylum seekers.
Perhaps election commentator Antony Green got it right when he accidentally referred to ‘Kevin Gillard’ on the ABC last night!
CANdo, a conservative action group, writes, "Who decided to abandon control of the borders? Who outsource our immigration policy to the criminal people smugglers? Who spent our surplus and then borrowed billions? Who wasted billions on the BER? Whose pink batts policy was a disaster, leading to the death of a number of young Australians? Whose grocery watch, fuel watch, computers in schools, etc. were complete failures?
"The answer to all is Kevin Rudd. Yet, Labor believes he will turn them back from the brink. Unfortunately opinion polling suggests they are right."
They go on to say, "Australians must not be complacent. Although no political party is perfect, CANdo recognises that it is in the national interest that Labor be defeated. The defeat should be so significant that they lose control of the Senate. CANdo is campaigning strongly to see this happen."
His views on Christianity
Regarding Kevin Rudd's views about Christianity, we wrote an article expressing concern about about his views prior to the 2007 election.
It is posted on our website - click here to read it.
The current situation
Julia Gillard visited the Governor-General last night to resign her commission as Prime Minister.
After seeking legal advice from the Solicitor-General, the Governor-General swore in Kevin Rudd as Prime Minister this morning at 10 am. Kevin Rudd took an oath of office on the Bible. Anthony Albanese and Chris Bowen were sworn in, both making an 'Affirmation'.
It was reported, "The Acting Solicitor-General Robert Orr QC said Ms Bryce would seek an assurance from Mr Rudd that he would announce his appointment to the House of Representatives "at the first possible opportunity". This would give the lower house the opportunity for "whatever, if any, action it chooses to take"."
During question time today Kevin Rudd said that the election date would perhaps be changed from September 14 - saying, there "won't be a huge variation one way or the other." The election can legally be held from August 3 up to the end of November.
The SMH ran a live blog on the developments – click here.
A live blog on today's developments: click here.
Labor leader Kevin Rudd to bring federal election forward after beating Julia Gillard in ballot, News.com, 27/6/2013.
Ministerial resignations follow Rudd leadership win, Ninemsn, 27/6/2013.
Rudd reviewing election date, Business Spectator, 27/6/2013.
- Greens Bill DEFEATED
- SA - attempt to legalise same-sex 'marriage'
- Fed Sexual orientation Bill & religious exemptions UPDATE
Federal - Greens foreign 'marriage' Bill DEFEATED!
Let's start with the Good News! The Senate has just voted on the Greens Bill to legally recognise same-sex 'marriages' that have been entered into overseas.
The Senate DEFEATED the Bill - the vote was 28 in favour, 45 against.
Labor Senators had a conscience vote but Liberal Senators did not.
Queensland Liberal Senator Sue Boyce, who is retiring at the next election, crossed the Bill to vote in favour of the Greens Bill.
Labor Senators David Feeney, Stephen Conroy and Ursula Stephens voted against the Bill.
Senator John Madigan didn’t support the Bill – but said he plans to introduce a Bill to have a referendum on the issue of same-sex 'marriage'.
Source: The Pulse – live politics, SMH, 20/6/2013.
SA – attempt to legalise same-sex ‘marriage’
In South Australia, Labor backbencher Susan Close plans to introduce a Bill TODAY to legalise same-sex ‘marriage’. The Bill is called the Same Sex Marriage Bill 2013.
The Bill would allow homosexual adults to 'marry' in SA, allow the 'marriage' to to be registered with the Births, Deaths and Marriages Office and provide a 'marriage' certificate.
Premier Jay Weatherill has said he supports the Bill and will vote in favour of it.
See media report: Premier Jay Weatherill says SA has right to legalise same-sex marriage, Adelaide Advertiser, 19/6/2013
Family Voice report that they have received legal advice that Dr Close’s bill would contravene the federal Marriage Act – but she is going ahead anyway.
If you live in SA please contact your MP in the House of Assembly and ALL Members of the Legislative Council to ask them to vote AGAINST this Bill. Click here for contact details.
Federal Sexual orientation Bill - REMOVAL of religious exemptions
The Senate is NOW debating the Sex Discrimination Amendment (Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Intersex Status) Bill 2013.
If you haven't contacted your Senators yet, please contact them NOW!
It seems that the Bill as originally passed by the House of Representatives did not contain ANY reference to the provision of aged care by religious groups.
Read the First reading version of the Bill
The government has now proposed amendments as the Bill is being considered by the Senate. Click here for Govt amendments.
Two of these affect aged care and religious exemptions:
1. No discrimination relating to potential residents
This relates to the acceptance of residents into an aged care facility.
"39A After subsection 23(3) Insert: (3A) Paragraph (3)(b) does not apply to accommodation provided by a religious body in connection with the provision, by the body, of Commonwealth-funded aged care."
2. General exemptions for religious bodies
Unlike the Committee's recommendation to remove ALL exemptions relating to religious bodies with respect to Commonwealth funded aged care on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity (as reported in our email earlier this week), the Government's PROPOSED AMENDMENT relates to ONLY Section 1 (d) of Section 37 of the Sex Discrimination Act.
The amendment reads,
"At the end of section 37 Add:
(2) Paragraph (1)(d) does not apply to an act or practice of a body established for religious purposes if: (a) the act or practice is connected with the provision, by the body, of Commonwealth-funded aged care; and
(b) the act or practice is not connected with the employment of persons to provide that aged care."
The Coalition says they will vote against any amendments that restrict religious freedom. However, Senator Brandis said the Coalition would support the original Bill.
He said that if the amendments were passed the Coalition would vote AGAINST the Bill.
IF the amendment/s pass the Bill will have to return to the House of Representatives for another vote - and the Government will have to rely on the votes of the Independents!
The Age reports, "Coalition legal affairs spokesman George Brandis said this week that while the Coalition supported a prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sexuality, it would oppose the removal of the exemption for religious organisations. Speaking in the Senate chamber late on Tuesday, Senator Brandis said if the amendment to remove the exemption succeeded, the Coalition would vote against the entire bill."
Liberal Senator Sue Boyce, from Queensland, has said she will cross the floor to vote in SUPPORT of the REMOVAL of exemptions for religious organisations that run Commonwealth-funded aged care.
Unfortunately, some religious organisations supported the removal of some or all religious exemptions in their submissions regarding this BILL - these include Mission Australia and the Uniting Church's UnitingCare.
For full information on the Bill, second reading speeches, etc by the Senate - click here.
For contact details for your Senators, click here!